To submit the report of the Cabinet Member for Finance.
Decision:
1. To set a
budget of £379,701,110 for 2026/27, to be funded by £264,009,390 of Government
Grant and £115,691,720 of Council Tax income (which is a base increase of 4.75%
plus a further 0.42% to meet the levy from the Fire Authority, which gives a
total of 5.17%).
2. A
capital programme of £40,179,430 in 2026/27 should be established, to be funded
from the sources set out in Appendix 4 of the report.
Minutes:
The report
was presented, stating that a number of questions
arose about how council tax was spent. Information was presented which
highlighted the main areas, such as that 80% of the funding went towards
Education and Care. It was highlighted that 8,000 hours per week were given to
domiciliary care each week, with 1500 individuals receiving a Telecare service.
It was noted that 12,000 people had received support through the Housing Action
plan since 2020. They highlighted that 93% of children had been able to stay at
home with their families through the Trobwynt
intervention, and that two Small Homes were now in operation, with a further
two homes on the way. It was expressed that good work was being done and that
the successes achieved by Council staff needed to be highlighted.
The budget
was presented stating that it was necessary to begin with the financial
forecasts from the current financial year in order to
fully understand the situation. It was highlighted that there was a £5.3m
overspend, where departmental budgets were not sufficient to meet the demand
for service. It was explained that the main demand was in care, with a deficit
of £3m in the Adults department and £1.8m in the
Children's Department. It was added that the overspend had been funded through the use of reserves. It was expressed that due to
the deal made in Cardiff at the end of last year, the settlement was much
better than predicted at 4.1% – an additional £10.4m.
It was
explained that as part of the budget-setting process the department had made a number of assumptions such as a pay rise of 4% for
teachers and 3.4% for the rest of the Council's workforce. Along with natural
inflation, it was noted that there was a need to invest in services, and there
were ambitious plans for the coming year such as investment in care and
education services.
It was
estimated that an additional £23.3m would need to be spent in the next
financial year to sustain our services, with the greatest pressure coming from
salary inflation, general inflation and the increase in the demand for
services. It was noted that this created a spending requirement for 2026/27 of
£380m. It was explained that the settlement from the Welsh Government was £264m
which left a gap of £116m. In terms of savings, it was highlighted that
£664,000 worth of savings had already been approved, with a quarter of a
million of these being available to cover the funding gap. As a result, in order to set a balanced budget this will mean raising the
Council Tax by 5.17%.
It was
explained that the tax base increased to just under 58k of dwellings due to an
increase in the number of properties, the number that were subject to the
Council Tax Premium and the decision to increase the premium on long-term empty
properties. They expressed that it was very disappointing that the tax increase
was higher than inflation once again, but the situation was much better than
what they had feared back in December.
The
Statutory Head of Finance drew attention to the Section 25 Statement in the
appendices, which was a personal statement by him highlighting the robustness
of the estimates on which the budget was based, as well as the potential risks
and mitigation actions. He emphasised that the Cabinet had received a
medium-term report back in September, and that the projections were being
updated regularly and were based on the latest information. He expressed that
accepting an annual settlement was challenging, and that the result of the
Senedd election in May would have implications for the Council.
The context
of the budget was highlighted by looking at this year's budget deficit which
highlighted the additional financial pressures on services, specifically social
care. He explained that there was a recommendation to fund £9.9m of bids to
address this. Despite this, he noted that the Council had a successful track
record of complying with financial standards, codes of practice and sound
governance organisation which was ratified annually by external financiers. It
was explained that inflation rates had fallen to 2%, but that political events
over the past week could affect them. Nevertheless, he remained confident that
the projections were watertight.
In the
context of the savings schemes, it was highlighted that the Council had managed
to make savings over the years but that pressures continued to materialise, but
there were mitigation measures in place to cope. It was reported that there was
£110m in reserves, with £7.9m in general balances as well. It was explained
that the general balances were at a reasonable level but needed to be reviewed.
It was reported that Audit Wales had reviewed the Council's management of
balances and had noted overall that the Council was constructive and provided
assurance that there were arrangements in place to deal with funds.
It was
noted that through the required work carried out to report on the robustness of
the estimates that underpinned the budget, and having considered all the risks
and mitigation actions, the Head of Finance was of the view that the Council's
Budget for 2026/27 was robust, adequate and achievable.
Members were given an opportunity to ask questions and offer
observations.
The
significance of the decision to set a budget at a time of financial pressure
was noted, and Plaid Cymru was thanked for reaching an agreement with the
Labour Government. It was stressed that no one wanted to raise the tax in the
face of financial pressure on residents. It was highlighted that excellent work
was being carried out within the available budget, without making cuts to
frontline services. In relation to the children's department, it was noted that
there had been a marked increase in the number of individuals with profound
complex needs who required specialist intervention. It was noted that this was
not an easy budget but it was responsible and
prioritised children and vulnerable people.
The members
thanked the officers for the report and asked with regard to
the financial assessment how premature the assessment was in
light of the events of the previous week, and that oil costs had risen
tremendously. It was expressed that the report had been published over a week
ago, therefore they could not have known of events of the previous week.
However, the assessment had been created with the situation as it was over a
week ago, therefore the members could be assured that it was correct when it was
sent. It was expressed that there were reserves for any costs that may increase
such as energy costs, and therefore the Council would be able to cope with a
rise in costs.
The Cabinet
Member for Adults indicated that he welcomed the effort to set a balanced
budget. He noted that he was seeing increased demand in the field daily, and
that the decision to allocate £9.9m for the extra pressure was critical to
securing services. He highlighted that setting the budget showed support for
frontline staff and reflected the true cost of care in order
to maintain quality, retain staff and avoid failures. It was recognised
that setting a sustainable budget formed the basis of a sustainable service,
albeit challenging in terms of finding the balance between raising taxes and
maintaining services. It was emphasised that the budget was a clear statement
of the values of the members, the county and their commitment to caring for
vulnerable residents.
Comments
were received from the Cabinet Member for Education who noted that the cost of
teaching the next generation was high. He drew attention in
particular to Additional Learning Needs, highlighting that additional
funding had been identified in the budget. He stated that it was new funding
that did not detract from any other services. Although this new funding was
welcomed, he noted that the money was not enough and that a national revolution
was needed. He highlighted that additional funding had been offered in England but no corresponding funding would be provided in
Wales. However, he noted that the Government had announced that significant
funding would be provided to the Welsh Government for ALN. He promised that
whichever party would lead the Senedd in May, he would try his best to
influence and receive a fair share of the money.
There was
agreement with the Cabinet Member for Education's comments, stressing the need
to lobby the funding and that there was truly a need for a national revolution.
It was
expressed that although £7.9 was available in the Council's general reserves,
this represented approximately 1.3% of the budget. They noted the need to
strengthen this, and that 3-5% was required.
It was
noted that Central Government over the years had put more and more pressure on
Local Government to maintain services at a lower level of budgets. The need to
get the money to deliver services was emphasised.
A member enquired whether the Council had a database that monitored how
many people who paid council tax had now had to apply for benefits, to see what
the trend was over time. It was noted that the department had information about
requests for discounts to Gwynedd, but not at a national level. A further
conversation was offered with the member in order to
understand what kind of information they required.
RESOLVED
1. To
establish a budget of £379,701,110 for 2026/27 to be funded through a
Government Grant of £264,009,390 and £115,691,720 of Council Tax income (which
is a base increase of 4.75% plus a further 0.42% to cover the levy from the
North Wales Fire and Rescue Authority, which gives a total of 5.17%)
2. To
establish a capital programme of £40,179,430 in 2026/27, to be funded from the
sources set out in Appendix 4 of the report.
Supporting documents: