Dewi
A. Morgan, Head of Finance (CJC’s Statutory Finance Officer) and
Sian Pugh, Assistant Head of
Finance to present the report.
Decision:
The
information and the decisions sought were considered.
Minutes:
The report
was presented detailing the out-turn position of the Strategic Planning,
Transport and Corporate elements. It was confirmed that the total net out-turn
position for these elements was an underspend of £1.067 million, and that £600k
of this underspend stemmed from grants received from the Welsh Government
during the year with these being used to fund costs that had originally been
budgeted.
It was
explained that they were seeking the Corporate Joint Committee's approval to
transfer the underspend to the earmarked reserve to fund expenditure in
subsequent years as the activities and functions of the Corporate Joint
Committee increased. It was elaborated that the Corporate Joint Committee had
already approved over £600k of this reserve to be used as part of the 2026/27
budget and this would then leave a balance of around one million in the fund.
The
out-turn position of the Growth Deal and the corresponding funding streams for
the year were highlighted. It was noted that the total underspend was £543k
with the main underspend under the employees heading. Members were reminded
that partner contributions only amounted to around 20% of the budget, which
were permanent sources of funding and the remainder were replaceable sources.
It was explained that the Corporate Joint Committee was being asked not to use
£61k of the reserve and to reduce the contribution from the Growth Deal grant
to £868k, to leave a neutral position for the year. It was added that these
sources would be used to finance expenditure in years to come and thus reduce
the risk of needing to increase partner contributions in future.
An update
was presented on movement in the Growth Deal funds during the year along with
their balances on 31 March 2026. It was explained that an interest reserve of
£5m had been set aside to fund borrowing costs in future years as the
expenditure on the capital schemes took place before the grant money was
received from the Government. It was recognised that the balance of the
resources reserve as at 31 March 2026 was £4.4m, and
almost one million of this fund had been earmarked for
use in the 2026/27 budget.
An update
was provided on the year-end review of the Growth Deal capital programme for
2025/26 and the spending profile from 2026/27 onwards. It was noted that a
total of £30.64million of expenditure had been made on the Growth Deal by the
end of 2025/26. It added that there was a net reduction of £14.28m in
expenditure for 2025/26 compared to the budget that had been approved in
February 2025, due to a slippage on projects.
The
financial position of the Regional Skills Partnership was presented, which
showed a neutral position for the year with the £290k expenditure being funded
by a Welsh Government grant.
It was
confirmed that the grant funding was a fixed amount and did not increase with
inflation.
Any
comments on the item were requested and received at the Portfolio Board Meeting
on 24 April and at the Economic Well-being Sub-Committee meeting on 15 May. It
was confirmed that no questions were asked during the Portfolio Board Meeting,
but a question had been raised at the Economic Well-being Sub-Committee meeting
regarding assurances that the money in the reserves was available for the
following year.
A member
asked if there was a guideline for the percentage of reserves that the CJC
should hold against the turnover. It was confirmed that there was no such
guide, but a general rule was that a 2.5% – 5% reserve was needed against the
gross expenditure. It was further noted that £600 thousand of reserves had been
included to keep the levy down.
It was
explained that there were two budgets for the CJC, namely the Growth Deal
budget which was funded through a Government grant,
the local authorities, and the four education bodies, and the CJC budget which
was achieved by charging a levy on the six councils. It was emphasised that
they were doing their best to provide assurance to the local authorities and
the CJC about how the reserves were used and this was reflected in the
Medium-Term Work Plan.
A member
asked whether the slippage in some projects was due to internal or external
factors, and what effect this would have on future years? It was confirmed that
any slippage regarding the Growth Deal was due to various external factors and
assurances were given that due diligence was always undertaken, although this
may slow down the process.
Concern was
expressed about the ambitious nature of commencing and completing any capital
project within a single financial year, with particular focus on the £4 million
Port of Mostyn project planned for 2026/27. They were assured that the project
was the financial contribution from the Growth Deal and was not a reflection of
the Development Programme. It was confirmed that the project would be under
regular review.
It was
confirmed that the report would be submitted to the Corporate Joint Committee
meeting for approval on 19 June.
Supporting documents: