To receive
the Pension Fund’s Annual Report for 2015-2016
Minutes:
The Head of Finance Department submitted the
Pension Fund Annual Report for 2015/16.
Particular attention was given to the main
matters of the report, namely:
·
Investment Performance
Asset
value:
It was reported
that an increase had been seen in the value of the Fund's assets from £1,497m
(31/03/2015) to £1,525m (31/03/2016) - an annual increase of £28m. The standard performance benchmark was -0.3%
for the 2015/16 year, therefore there was room to be grateful to the Fund's
managers for managing to obtain +1.3% during the year.
Between 1 April
2016 and 30 June 2016, it was noted that the market value of the Fund had risen
by a further £58m to £1,583m; however, following the UK's referendum on EU
Membership and the result of the vote to leave, a direct impact had been seen
in the value of the pound and UK interest rates. The global markets had improved following the
original reduction following the results of the referendum; however, it was
difficult to anticipate the long-term impact of 'Brexit' on the Gwynedd Pension
Fund.
The excellent performance of Veritas (the Fund's equity investors) was
highlighted, along with the very good performance of Threadneedle and UBS
(property investors), and exceptionally good returns from Partners Group in
2015/16 as Private Equity investments came into fruition, following a long-term
investment by the Fund in this category.
·
Joint-investment
It was reported that the Westminster Government
had decided to pool the LGPS investments rather than merge funds. This meant
that the Gwynedd Pension Fund would continue separate to funds such as Clwyd,
Powys, etc; however, the investments would be made through a cooperative
structure. It was reiterated that the
eight Welsh Funds had already started to joint-invest.
A consultation had been held by the Department for Communities and Local
Government ("DCLG"), demanding presentations from all funds in
England and Wales, explaining their collaboration plans and the savings
expected to achieve. It was explained that the All Wales collaboration project
(worth £12 billion) did not meet the Treasury's standard requirements in terms
of size (£25 billion); however, the Government had agreed that the
collaboration work should continue. It was noted that the pool's governance
structure was being designed and that responsibilities were being agreed upon,
before the new structure would be operational in 2017. The hope would be for a
governance joint-committee to be established with each of the eight Funds
having one vote on it.
The pooling system would shift the decisions
regarding the appointment, monitoring and termination of individual investment
managers away from each Fund. However,
the Gwynedd Pensions Committee would continue to be responsible for the
investment strategy, and the asset allocation between the categories of equity,
property, etc., namely the most significant driver on investment returns.
It was announced that further information about
the joint-investment plans were available on the Fund's website.
The Chair gave assurance that the accountability would remain local which
enabled the Fund to respond to the needs of members. He noted that the next step would be to
create a Shadow Joint-committee. Thus far, he reiterated that the signs were
positive with beneficial collaboration between the Chairs of the eight Funds,
and substantial savings had already been achieved on the fees for passive
equity investments.
·
Pension Board
It was reported
that the constitution of the Gwynedd Pension Fund Board had been established in
March 2015 and the first meeting had been held in July 2015 (reference was made
to the Pension Board's annual report that had been included in the Fund's
report). It was explained that the Board
had an observer present at the Pensions Committee's meetings, whilst the Chair
of the Committee attended the Board's meetings, in order to be accountable for
decisions and performance, alongside the Fund's officers.
The Chair reiterated that he welcomed another level of governance that
would ensure the best for the Fund. He
confirmed that the Pension Board was challenging and scrutinising the decisions
of the Pensions Committee and that it already observed meetings.
·
Results of the Valuation
It was noted that the results of the triennial actuarial
valuation of 31 March 2016 were to be published during a meeting of all
employers on 10 November 2016 where the Fund Actuary would present the
results. Each employer was encouraged
to attend that meeting in order to understand the process and assumptions used
to reach the contribution rates of individual employers.
It was reiterated that the Administration Unit had
been dealing with membership data for the valuation over a period of months
with the Fund's staff resources having been prioritised to ensure that the data
was accurate. Employers were asked to
continue to send data about their employees regularly in the future, so that
the reports were more accurate.
As the situation of each individual employer within
the Fund was different, in general, the strength of the Fund should allow for a
flexible approach towards setting the employer pension contribution rate
level. It was reported that the officers
and actuary were fully aware that minimising any increase in contribution rates
was important considering the continuous squeeze on public spending.
The
primary objective was to ensure that employers would have affordable, fair and
sustainable contribution strategies for 2017/18 - 2019/20; however, this needed
to reflect their own individual circumstances.
It was reported that there were two elements within employer pension
contributions
(not
employee contributions).
· The rate of the main
contribution, namely the primary contribution rate or the future service rate.
· The additional contribution rate,
namely the secondary contribution rate or deficit
recovery element
It was expected for the main rate for the future's
liabilities to increase, due to a reduction in the discount rate. It was explained that the actuary discounted the
value of the pensions that would have to pay out in the future in order to
identify the net present value (NPV) of those liabilities. It was reiterated that the discount rate was
linked to the Government's bond returns.
It was noted that the Government had reduced interest rates to an
incredibly low level in order to boost the economy. One impact of that was that the present value
of pension liabilities was higher, due to a reduced discount impact.
Nevertheless, it was noted that a reduction was expected
in the contribution rate for recovering historic deficits, due to a performance
that was better than expected when investing on the stock market since 2013,
and it was expected for the historic "deficit" to reduce again. In the 2013 valuation, the Fund's funding
level was 85% for the entire fund. It
was expected for the funding level for 2016 to improve to approximately 91%,
with individual employer percentages varying around this average. Unfortunately, it was expected for the
increase in the principal rate (future pressures) to be slightly more than the
reduction in the rate that recovered the historic deficit.
It was not possible to predict the deficit level of
individual employers, or the contribution level. Nevertheless, it was expected that the
majority of the Fund's employers would be able to cope with the upward pressure
on their pension contributions. It was
highlighted that the Fund's staff and employers had worked on this in order to
ensure that the information for the actuarial valuation was as accurate and
timely as possible.
Everyone was
thanked for their support during 2015/16, along with their positive and
conscientious contributions during the year.
RESOLVED
TO ACCEPT THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PENSION FUND FOR 2015/16.
Supporting documents: