DECISION: To refuse
Reasons
1.
The proposal, due to its size and setting is contrary
to the requirements of policies PCYFF 3 and TAI 4 of the LDP. It is considered that
the proposal would be contrary to the development pattern due to the lack of
curtilage /open area around the house.
It is not considered that the proposal will add to or improve the
character and appearance of the site and there would be a loss of an open space
between existing dwellings that will damage the appearance and character of the
streetscape and the conservation area.
2.
It is considered that the proposal is contrary to the
requirements of policies PS19, PS20, AT 1 and AMG 1 of the LDP as the proposal
would not, due to the loss of an open space as well as the size and appearance
of the house, safeguard or improve the setting and appearance of the
conservation area or the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the important
views in and out of the area.