It was
resolved:
·
To
accept the report, noting the observations made during the discussion.
·
That
the Committee welcomed the work of trying to meet the maintenance costs of
active travel routes.
·
To
recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:
Ø
there
was a need to look at expenditure for the maintenance of active travel routes
and costs of grass cutting/growth on verges to consider whether there were any
potential savings.
Ø
questions
about the maintenance of active travel routes and a question about local issues
should be included in the public consultation.
Ø
risk
assessment arrangements should be examined.