8 Application No C18/0993/26/LL - Land by Hen Gapel, Ffordd Waunfawr, Caeathro, Caernarfon PDF 138 KB
Vary condition 1 on planning permission C09A/0412/26/LL so as to extend the time granted to commence work for another 5 years
LOCAL MEMBER:
Councillor Edgar Wyn Owen
Link
to relevant background documents
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Application Number C18/0993/26/LL – Land Adjacent
to Hen Gapel, Ffordd
Waunfawr, Caeathro
Change condition 1 of planning permission
C09A/0412/26/LL in order to extend the time granted to commence work for a
further five years
(a) The
Development Control Manager elaborated on the background of the application, and
noted that the application was deferred in the
committee meeting on 29.4.19 in order to allow the Planning Officers to
consider the late observations of the Language Unit.
It was highlighted that the
entire application was located within the development boundary of Caeathro as included in the LDP, in a relatively prominent locationin the centre of the village. It was noted that
the design, elevations, materials, plan or form of the houses had not changed
since the previous application was approved in 2014 and so it was considered
that the proposal remained acceptable.
It was reported that the
development included four affordable houses, which equated to 33%. As no official valuation has been received to
establish the open market value of the houses, it was noted that the developer
would be required to agree an the price with the Planning Department in order to
determine an appropriate discount for the affordable houses. It was highlighted
that this could be done by means of an appropriate condition that would ensure
affordable housing.
When considering educational provision matters, it was
anticipated that a total of 15 primary school pupils
would emanate from this application for 12 houses, along with another of the
developer's developments for 29 houses in Bontnewydd. It was highlighted
that Ysgol Bontnewydd,
namely the catchment area school, had capacity for 182 pupils (167 at
present). Consequently, no financial
contribution would be required for the educational provision as admitting an
additional 15 pupils would not exceed the capacity.
It was considered that the proposal was acceptable in terms of
the principle, location, scale, density, visual / residential amenities, road
safety and infrastructure matters and in accordance with the relevant policies.
(b) Taking
advantage of the right to speak, the applicant’s agent noted the following main
points:-
·
That the application had already been identified as
suitable and had been approved in 2014
·
That it was located within
the Development Plan
·
Due to the challenging
period in the construction sector, the developer had not been able to act
within the period of time and therefore he was requesting an extension
·
That no adaptations had
been made to the original application
·
That the developer would
use local contractors and local materials
(c)
The local member (a member of this
Planning Committee) made the following main points:-
·
That
there was a need for housing in Caeathro
·
That he was supportive of the development.
(ch) It was
proposed and seconded to approve the application.
(d) In response to a comment regarding flooding concerns on the site, it was highlighted that Planning Officers had consulted with Welsh Water and Natural Resources Wales and they were satisfied with the mitigation measures and the relevant conditions ... view the full minutes text for item 8
6 Application No. C18/0993/26/LL - Land by Hen Gapel, Ffordd Waunfawr, Caeathro, Caernarfon PDF 133 KB
Vary condition 1 on planning permission C09A/0412/26/LL so as to extend the time granted to commence work for another 5 years.
LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Edgar
Wyn Owen
Link to relevant background documents
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Application to change
condition 1 of planning permission C09A/0412/26/LL in order to extend the time
granted to commence work for a further five years
(a) It was reported that late
observations had been received from the Language Unit, the Committee was asked
to defer the application until the meeting of 20 May 2019 in order to give
planning officers time to consider the observations and deal with them.
RESOLVED to defer the
application.