Venue: Cyfarfod Rhithiol / Virtual Meeting. View directions
Contact: Lowri Haf Evans 01286 679878
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To receive apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies had
been received from Councillors John Brynmor Hughes, Medwyn Hughes, Huw Rowlands
and Meryl Roberts |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declaration of personal interest. Minutes: None to
note |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any items which are urgent business in the opinion of the Chairman so they may be considered. Minutes: None to note |
|
The Chairman shall propose
that the minutes of the meeting of this committee, held on 8th
September 2022, be signed as a true record. Minutes: The Chair signed the
minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, held on 8 September 2022, as a true record. In response to the comment submitted at the previous meeting regarding including a standing item on the agenda of every committee meeting, providing an update on
matters raised for Members as well as implementing the decision, the Monitoring Officer noted that there
was no legal requirement to have matters arising as a statutory item on the agenda. He reiterated that he would
discuss with the Head of Finance how to address the committee's wish to receive updates on decisions
and it was suggested that a short report
would be acceptable, instead of an open
item. |
|
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ELECTIONS (WALES) ACT 2021 PDF 465 KB To accept the report
and progress and request a further
report to the February Committee Additional documents: Decision: DECISION: 1.
To accept the report 2. To accept the progress on the Work Programme 3. Request for a further update to Committee in February
2023 Minutes: a)
A report was submitted by the Head of Legal Services (Monitoring Officer) noting, following Royal Assent, that the provisions of the Local Government
and Elections (Wales) Act
2021 had now come into force and
although some elements of the Statutory Guidance are to be published, it will not be expected for these
to divert significantly from the drafts consulted upon. In response to the requirements of the Act, reference
was made to the work programme that had already been set within the Council's Corporate Risk Register with
the Governance and Audit Committee keeping an overview
and assurance on the actions required to act upon the provisions. Reference was made to three work fields,
the Public Participation Strategy, the Petitions Scheme and Constitution
Guidelines, which need to be moved on by conducting a consultation process. Thanks were
expressed for the report. b)
In response to a question
regarding the Council's right to choose a Majority Voting or Single Transferable Vote (STV) procedure, and considering that Gwynedd, in the 2022 election, had the highest number of Councillors elected unopposed, the Monitoring Officer noted that this
was an opportunity for Gwynedd to decide how to respond to the choice. He reiterated that adapting the current process would include a detailed review of the situation, that would likely include
a review of boundaries, substantial procedural adaptation and consultation as statutory elements. The choice before members was to consider commencing the process or not - there would be a need to come to an opinion
on how to deal with the option. In response to a supplementary question, from the response of other Authorities to the matter, he expressed
that other Authorities were in a similar position
of considering opening discussions. In response to the question on appointing
Lay Members, it was expressed that the process was now a continuous one. It was accepted that there
were two vacant seats on
the Committee and in response, it was noted that despite
the second advertisement, that no interest
had been shown. It was reiterated that the posts would remain
open and the closing date would
be extended and the Members were encouraged,
if they knew
of anyone who was interested, to refer the name to the Head of Finance. In response to a question regarding the features of the Participation Strategy, it was noted that there now
was a statutory duty to encourage participation with decisions that had been made
and that this was being implemented by sharing information on the website, such as decision notices and forward work
programmes. The aim was to create a procedure that addressed the duty, without being
a burdensome system. In response to an observation about the consultation process, and that this was to be welcomed, a Member highlighted that there was a ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2022/23 – END OF AUGUST 2022 REVIEW PDF 186 KB To receive the information,
consider the risks regarding the Capital Programme, and scrutinise the decisions for the Cabinet Additional documents: Decision: DECISION: To accept the report and note the situation
and relevant risks in the context of the Council's capital programme Minutes: a) Submitted - a report at the request of the
Cabinet Member for Finance, Councillor Ioan Thomas.
The main purpose of the report
was to present the capital programme (position as at the end of August 2022), as well as approve the relevant funding sources. Contrary to the usual procedure, the Committee was asked to scrutinise the information before it was submitted for Cabinet approval on 25 October 2022. Reference was made to an analysis per Department of the
£136.3 million capital programme for the 3 years from 2022/23 - 2024/25, as
well as the sources available
to fund the net increase which are approximately
£10.1 million since the original budget. The Senior Finance Manager
reiterated, ·
that the Council had definitive
plans in place to invest around £79.8 million this year, with
£21.1 million (namely 27%)
of this funded via specific grants. ·
that the impact of recent
financial challenges continued on the capital programme and that only
11% of the budget had been spent up to the end of August 2022, compared with over
16% for the same period in 2021 and 13% in 2020. ·
that £12.1m of proposed expenditure
had been re-profiled from 2022/23 to 2023/24 and
2024/25 with the main schemes
including, £5.1 million for Schools Schemes
- Sustainable Learning Communities and Others, £3.0 million for Flood Prevention
Schemes and £1.6 million for the Penygroes Health and Care Hub. Attention was drawn to the
list of additional grants that the Council had managed to attract since the previous period, which included the Free School Meals
Capital Grant, Sustainable Learning Communities Grant - Schools Community Use, Road Safety Capital Grant from the Welsh Government and the Wales Voluntary Action Council (WVAC)
Grant towards rural schemes. Gratitude was expressed for the concise and clear
report b) In response
to a question regarding an increase in
borrowing, it was noted that this was the first review since
the end of March 2022, and that an increase
existed as a result of slippages, with a decision awaited regarding the re-profiling. In response to a question about the harmful impact on the delay
of the Flood Prevention Schemes, it was noted that a number of discussions were being held between
Ymgynghoriaeth Gwynedd Consultancy
and Welsh Government on this matter,
since a number of plans were in
place and that this was a figure to protect the work. c) It was proposed and seconded to accept the report RESOLVED: To accept the report and note the situation
and relevant risks in the context
of the Council's capital programme |
|
REVENUE BUDGET 2022/23 – END OF AUGUST 2022 REVIEW PDF 253 KB To receive the information,
consider the risks arising from the forecast expenditure against the budget,
and scrutinise the decisions to be presented to Cabinet regarding budget
management by the Council and its departments Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION: 1.
To
accept the report and note the situation and relevant risks in the context of
the budgets of the Council and its departments. 2. Agree with the recommendation for the
Cabinet to use: ·
School
Balances to fund the increase in electricity prices in schools ·
£4.5
million from the post-Covid recovery arrangements
fund established to fund the associated financial challenges that face the
Council ·
The rest
to be financed from the Financial Strategy Reserve. 3. That a progress report of the actions is
submitted to the Committee following discussions with the Chief Executive and
the Highways and Municipal Department regarding the Department's overspend (the
report to include a response to the recommendations submitted to the Department
by WRAP Cymru). Minutes: a)
Submitted - the report
of the Cabinet Member for Finance, Councillor Ioan
Thomas, requesting
that the committee scrutinises the position and relevant risks
in the context of the Council's budgets and its departments,
and submit observations to the Cabinet for approval on 25 October 2022. The
Cabinet Member for Finance set out
the context for the report, noting the following:- ·
That the Adults, Health and Well-being Department was overspending, which is a combination of factors, including the failure to realise savings ·
That the Economy and Community Department
was seeing the impact of increasing energy costs ·
That the Highways and
Municipal Department was highlighting
the lack of realising savings in the field of waste ·
That the Housing and Property Department was seeing an impact
in the homelessness field as a result of an amendment to Covid-19 legislative arrangements ·
That it was intended to look
at school balances to fund the overspend anticipated on electricity costs this year as the schools had saved energy over the Covid period The Senior Finance
Manager referred to a summary of the final position of all departments and highlighted the fields where there
had been significant differences. Attention was drawn
to the impact of the increase
in inflation, particularly the costs of electricity, which were above the budget and to be seen most prominently in the Education, Highways and Municipal, and Economy and
Community Departments - on the leisure centres of Cwmni Byw'n Iach. ·
In the context of Covid, although the impact was not as substantial in 2022/23 in comparison
with the two previous years, the additional costs, income losses and
slippages on savings schemes as a result of Covid, continued in some
fields. ·
The
Adults, Health and Well-being Department - anticipated overspend of £1.9 million this year, this
being a combination of factors, including a failure to realise savings to the value of £930k. Very obviously this year, pressure
was seen on supported accommodation and direct payment
packages, as well as staffing
costs and a lack of income in the Community Care field. ·
Education Department - an overspend of £1.3m was anticipated as a result of the impact of higher electricity costs for a six-month period from October
2022 onwards at the schools.
Considering that the schools had already benefited from almost a million in energy savings
which had derived from Covid and
the associated lockdowns,
it was therefore considered
appropriate to use school balances to fund the additional pressures this year. · Byw'n Iach - as a result of the impact of Covid, the company received financial support from the Welsh Government's hardship fund (to the value of £1.4 million in 2021/22 and £2.7 million in 2020/21). Such support was not available from the Government this year, but the impact of Covid was continuing in 2022/23 and was disrupting the ability to generate income. As ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
SAVINGS OVERVIEW: PROGRESS REPORT ON REALISING SAVINGS SCHEMES PDF 183 KB To eceive the information,
consider the general risks arising from
the savings slippages Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION: 1.
To accept the report and note the situation
and relevant risks in the context of the Savings Overview 2. To
recommend to the Cabinet that detailed challenge is required on unrealised
schemes – need to ensure regular review of those schemes that are slipping and
refer the schemes to the relevant Scrutiny Committees’ work programme Minutes: a) A report was submitted
by the Cabinet Member for Finance, which summarised the Council's savings position. He asked the committee to note the situation and relevant risks
in the context of the Savings Overview and offer observations on the situation for the Cabinet to consider as they approved the report on 25 October
2022. It was also explained
that the departments had presented the savings schemes and that
the finance officers were merely reporting
on the situation. The Senior Finance Manager
reiterated: ·
Since 2015/16, as part of the Council's financial strategy, savings to the value of £35.4m
had been approved to be realised during the 2015/16 -
2022/23 period. It was noted
that a total of £33.4 million of savings had been realised, which was 94% of the required amount over the period. ·
That the impact
of Covid seemed to have contributed to the slippage in the savings programme in some fields.
·
The main schemes that were
yet to be achieved were schemes those
in the Adults, Health and Well-being Department and the Highways and Municipal Department. ·
That there
was a need, when preparing the 2022/23 budget, to acknowledge that the situation had changed so much that
there was no way to achieve the savings that had been planned originally, and therefore, almost £500k of plans were removed from
the budget and the delivery profile was moved for plans
to the value of £1.3 million
for 2023/24 and subsequent years. ·
That it was inevitable that realising savings to the value of £33.4m (out of a total of £35.4 million) since April 2015, had been challenging. With a delay and
risks to delivering some of the remaining schemes, there was a need to review the plans by the end of the financial year. Gratitude was expressed for
the report and it was expressed that the positive elements in the report needed
to be congratulated - b)
During the ensuing
discussion, the following observations were made by members: ·
That 94% of the schemes had been
completed - this was encouraging ·
That the departments
themselves had proposed the
savings and they were not something
that had been forced on them ·
That some
of the schemes were historical ·
That pressure needed to
be placed on those departments that were unable to achieve savings to reconsider plans or plan again ·
That there was a need to
encourage more detailed information - if there was no movement
on schemes, then better schemes
were needed ·
When planning new savings, there was a need to consider elements that were
beyond control - the impact of making cuts today leading
to greater expenditure in the future, e.g. road maintenance ·
Suggestion to highlight
clearly that appendix 4 features slipping savings ·
That savings
schemes needed to be challenged in more detail in the future · Eager for plans that were slipping schemes to be ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |