Venue: Zoom
Contact: Natalie Lloyd Jones 01286 679780
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Anwen Hughes. |
|
DECLARATION OF PERSONAL INTEREST To receive any declaration of personal interest. Minutes: None to note. |
|
URGENT ITEMS To note any
items that are a matter of urgency in the view of the Chair for consideration. Minutes: None to note. |
|
The Chair
shall propose that the minutes of the last meeting of this committee held on 29th
June 2021, be signed as a true record. Minutes: It was agreed that the minutes of the previous committee meeting, held
on 29 June 2021, were accurate. |
|
COMMITTEES FRAMEWORK PDF 293 KB Submit
a draft Committee Operating Framework in order for it to be recommended for the
Full Council to adopt Decision: To approve the
Committee Framework to be submitted before the Full Council in December. Minutes: DECISION To
approve the Committee Framework to be submitted before the Full Council in
December. The report was presented by the Head of Corporate
Support Department who noted that there had been several discussions about the
meetings framework for the future. He explained that the Full Council had
agreed on interim arrangements and that it was intended to present this report
to the Full Council on 2 December 2021. The Democracy and Language Services Manager noted that
the report was a foundation for the future to ensure a sustainable framework
for the Committees. The Committee was reminded of the period when it was
established which committees should be webcast, namely based on the meetings
that were of most interest to the public and, therefore, the same principle was
used in order to choose the hybrid and virtual only Committees. It was noted that the Full Council, Cabinet, Planning
Committee and Scrutiny Committee would be held as hybrid meetings. It was
explained that all other Committees and meetings would be virtual only. The Head of Legal Services added that, statutorily,
there were only two choices, namely meetings that are virtual only, hybrid or a
combination of both. He added that it was a matter of deciding the best
procedure in order to ensure access for the public and to promote democracy During the discussion the following observations were
made: ·
Members agreed with the
report and it was noted that they understood the logic and the principles.
However, from experience, it was noted that hybrid meetings could be
frustrating for example they could be difficult to chair. ·
It was asked whether
resources would be available for councillors to attend virtually from Council
offices if they happened to be there for other meetings. ·
It was agreed that the
standard of hardware may be high, however, it was noted that the standard of
internet connection right across Gwynedd was not good. A member added that
technical problems could affect the timing of meetings. ·
A comment was added
that the arrangements allowed councillors from areas a considerable distance
from Caernarfon to spend more times on ward matters and less time travelling to
Committees. - Concern was expressed regarding the arrangements of hybrid
meetings in terms of chairing and fairness for members. ·
There was agreement
regarding the good practice of starting meeting earlier so that all members
could ensure they could connect to the technology. ·
It was suggested that meetings
should be started earlier in order to give time to resolve technical problems. ·
It was accepted that
hybrid methods resulted in a wider representation amongst councillors. ·
A question was asked
about the procedure for closed Committees e.g. Licensing The Head of Corporate Support Department responded to
the above as follows: ·
It had been ensured
that there was provision for members to access an office to be a part of a
virtual meeting ·
The Democracy and
Language Services Manager added that the service was looking at the provision
for new members from 2022. · She added that the ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
To
submit an update on the preparations for
the Local Government Elections, May 2022 Additional documents: Decision: a)
To accept the report. b) Establish an Elections Sub-group with five members of the Committee. Minutes: DECISION a) To accept the report. b) Establish an Elections Sub-group with five members of the Committee. The report was presented by the Democracy Team Leader
to update the members regarding the work of the Democracy team in preparing for
the 2022 elections. An overview of the democracy week which had been held to
raise awareness on social media was given, and it was added that the Council
would continue to share messages over the coming weeks and months. She added
that a question-and-answer session had been held and that another one would be
held in January with the support of the elections team. It was asked whether it would be possible to create an
election sub-group to give opinion on matters such as the intranet, an
information booklet for councillors, and the training schedule. Members’ attention was drawn to the members intranet
as several updates had been made to it. During the discussion the following observations were
made: ·
A comment was made that
details of which officers to contact for various matters should be provided. ·
The following members
agreed to be a part of the members sub-group: Councillors Dewi Roberts, Gwynfor
Owen, Anne Lloyd Jones, Mair Rowlands and Dewi Owen. |
|
GWYNEDD COUNCIL'S DIVERSITY DECLARATION PDF 373 KB To submit a draft work programme outlining
the steps in order to realise the Gwynedd Council Diversity Statement, and
recommend for it to be adopted by the Full Council Decision: To accept the report and support the Diversity
Statement and recommend it to the Full Council meeting on 2 December, 2021. Minutes: DECISION To
accept the report and support the Diversity Statement and recommend it to the
Full Council meeting on 2 December 2021. The report was presented for information by the
Democracy and Language Services Manager, and members were reminded that the
committee had already adopted the statement at the full Council. A
work programme to fulfil the statement was presented. No
further observations were received from members. |
|
INDEPENDENT REMUNERATION PANEL FOR WALES DRAFT REPORT PDF 347 KB To receive
Members’ comments on the draft report. Decision: To accept the report and note the
observations received. Minutes: DECISION To
accept the report and note the observation received. The Democracy and Language Services Manager presented
the report, which involved assisting with planning a response to the draft
consultation. It was noted that the main decisions had been outlined within the
report. It was added that a decision had been made this year
to recommend bringing the salary level of Elected Members to the level they
should be. Consequently, it was noted that the proposed salary increase to
£16,800 from 2022 onwards for elected Members. Further observations were given by the Council Leader
outlining the Members' experience during the Covid-19 period which had showed
that the work of local councils was critically important to our communities. He
added that Local Government should be considered as equal in terms of the role
within society as any other tier of Government whether central or local
Government. In relation to the salary increases for members, he noted that the
salary was to allow people without another source of income to stand as
Councillor. During the discussion the following observations were
made: ·
There was agreement
with the Leader’s comments, and reference was made to a point in the report
involving Community councils, that is, that it was not fair for anyone to have
to vote on their own salary. ·
The point was raised
that Chairs worked very hard and that they had additional work; however, this
may not be public knowledge and that the public’s attention should be drawn to
this work. ·
Concern was expressed
that people would think that councillors were increasing their own salaries
whereas it was an independent panel making the decision. ·
It was noted that though
many councillors were retired and did not depend on the income, offering an
equal salary would ensure that there would be an opportunity for more people to
stand for election. ·
In relation to the
discussion on diversity in democracy, it was noted that it was difficult to do
the job of a Councillor properly if an individual works as well. It was added
that young people could not afford to be a full-time councillor only without
having a job on the side. ·
The Committee's
attention was drawn to the care cost allocation as very few claimed this
despite it being anonymous. ·
It was asked what the
procedure was if a Councillor wished to refuse the salary increase. In response to the Democracy and Language Services
Manager noted that an individual members would need to write to the Head of
Democracy Services to refuse the salary increase if that was their wish. |
|
MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY PDF 233 KB To share the
responses received to the Member Satisfaction with the Democracy Services Team
Survey Decision: To accept the report and note the
observations received. Minutes: DECISION To
accept the report and note the observations received. The Democracy Team Leader presented the report and
responses following the questionnaire were shared. She noted that the team was
eager to improve the service provided and has therefore asked Members about
their opinions. The
data gathered and comments received were shared. During
the discussion the following observations were made: ·
A member noted that if
a Councillor did not respond that this showed that they were satisfied with the
service received. A member added that he was
pleased that the officers had contacted him to discuss the comments in order to
resolve matters quickly. |