Erection of 15 residential dwellings with 5 to be affordable houses, formation of new vehicular access and internal access road.
LOCAL MEMBER: Councillor Dylan Bullard
Minutes:
Build 15 new
dwellings, of which five were affordable, create a new vehicular entrance and
internal access road.
(a) The
Planning Manager elaborated on the background of the application and noted that
the application was an outline application, with the access and layout forming
part of the outline application and were matters for consideration. It was explained that matters concerning appearance,
landscaping and scale were reserved matters, and therefore were not matters for
consideration as part of the application. It was noted
that the development would include a mixture of single-storey and two-storey
housing with two, three and four bedrooms.
It was explained that the site was located within the
development boundary of Pwllheli, and had been
denoted for housing in the Joint Local Development Plan (LDP). It was noted that five of the houses would be for affordable
needs, namely two-bedroom units that included four terraced houses and one
bungalow. It was highlighted that the Housing
Strategic Unit had confirmed the need for this type of housing in Pwllheli. It was noted that the
proposal offered an appropriate variety of houses on the site, thus complying
with the requirements of Policy TAI 8 within the LDP and the Supplementary
Planning Guidance - Housing Mix.
It was noted that with regard to visual, general and
residential amenity matters, it could be ensured that these matters were
acceptable through the reserved matters along with the conditions recommended
on the submitted application. It was elaborated that
the proposal was acceptable in terms of biodiversity and transportation. It was added that the Town Council supported the application
Attention
was drawn to the additional observations received that
included confirmation from the Joint Planning Policy Unit that the financial
contribution required towards play areas / open spaces was £5,001.71. It was explained that the contribution would be ensured via a
106 agreement.
The development
was acceptable in terms of relevant local and national policies for the reasons
noted in the report.
It was noted that the recommendation had been amended to what was
noted in the report, on the grounds of additional information received that the
applicant had not held discussions with a housing association in relation to
transferring the houses, as the application was currently an outline
application, but there was an intention to do so and to construct the houses to
housing association building standards ('DQR' standard) that would enable the
units to be transferred to a housing association. It was
recommended to ensure affordable housing through a condition rather than
a 106 agreement because the discount could be assessed under a reserved matters
application when details such as design and size were confirmed. It was also recommended to issue an additional condition in
order to ensure Welsh names for the houses/estate.
(b) Exercising the
right to speak, the applicant’s agent noted the following main points:-
·
That this was an outline application, and that the
layout of the site and access were to be agreed;
·
Five houses would be affordable, and there was a
condition to ensure that this was acceptable for the applicant;
·
As an outline application was
submitted, the applicant had not contacted housing associations, but the
design of the houses in question were to the 'DQR' standard of social housing.
Housing associations had expressed an interest, but no detailed discussions had
been held;
·
That the site had been earmarked for housing with
fewer houses being developed than what was noted in the LDP;
·
Discussions were held with
the Transportation Unit with regard to the location of the access in order to
ensure adequate visibility. There was adequate parking provision on the site
for the development.
(c) It was
proposed and seconded to approve the application.
During the ensuing discussion, the
following main observations were noted by members:
·
That there was a need for this type of housing, but
that the location needed to be considered. The road
leading to the site was narrow and dangerous, with
cars parked on the hill. There was concern that the residents would use the
back road to the direction of Iocws, which linked
with the A499 near Ysbyty Bryn Beryl. Attention was drawn to the fact that the Town Council was supportive
of the application, but highlighted the use of the road that was already a busy
road, and that many observations had been received as part of the public
consultation with regard to road safety. That there was a need for this type of
housing, but that the location needed to be considered.
·
There was no pavement on the road to the site, and
the road was narrow and very dangerous, with substantial traffic movements;
·
Satisfied that the development would not make the
road more dangerous, and happy to support the proposal;
·
That the time to object to the site as a housing
development site was when the LDP was drawn up - happy with the proposal;
·
Would it be possible to create a pavement on the
road towards the site to mitigate the risks? The fact that no accidents on the
road had been recorded did not mean that an accident
could not happen.
(ch)
In response to the above
observations, the officers noted:
·
That the site had been designated for
housing in the LDP - the site would not have been included in the plan if it was not acceptable with regard to transportation. That the
recommendation was firm, and caution was needed as it was possible that there
would be costs against the Council in an appeal should the application be
refused on the grounds of road safety concerns;
·
That the proposal provided five
affordable houses and a suitable housing mix;
·
That the proposal offered an
improvement to the existing situation, as there would be a pavement in front of
the site, and an improvement in terms of visibility at the access due to its
location. There were traffic calming measures on the hill to slow down traffic,
history of pedestrian use and heavy traffic and no accidents, therefore, there
was no evidence to show that the road was dangerous;
·
It was not possible to create a
pavement on the road because the land on one side was owned
by various owners, and there was a retaining wall on the other side. It
would be possible to place road markings to designate a corridor for
pedestrians. This may be a matter for further consideration.
RESOLVED to
delegate powers to the Senior Planning Manager to approve the application
subject to signing a 106 agreement to ensure the financial contribution toward
playing fields / open spaces and subject to the following conditions:
1. The commencement of the development and the
submission of reserved matters (appearance, landscaping, scale)
2. Slate on the roof
3. Agree on materials for the external
elevations
4. Road conditions
5. Welsh Water condition to connect foul water
only to the public sewer
6. Submit and agree on a detailed drainage strategy
7. Relocate reptiles
8. No site clearance work during the bird nesting season
9. Lighting plan in accordance with what is in
the ecological assessment
10. Protect hedgerows
11. Fence to protect trees roots
12. Standard condition for large developments to
inform of commencement of work
13. Removal of general development rights for the
affordable houses
14. Restriction on working hours
15. Agree on a method of ensuring five affordable
houses
16. Welsh names for the houses/the estate
Supporting documents: